“Beautiful and heartbreaking in equal measure.” ~ Bobby LePire, Film Threat
“It’s a daring narrative mix of the personal and the political.” ~ Ben Kenigsberg, New York Times
“Beautiful and heartbreaking in equal measure.” ~ Bobby LePire, Film Threat
“It’s a daring narrative mix of the personal and the political.” ~ Ben Kenigsberg, New York Times
Laemmle Theatres is excited to partner with the Cinema Foundation to celebrate the second annual National Cinema Day this Sunday, August 27th.
All seven Laemmle venues will be participating in the one-day event, which celebrates the power of movies to bring us all together, and discounted admissions for all movies in all formats (including Premium Large Format screens) will be no more than $4. What’s more, we’re discounting our fresh popcorn: $2 small, $4 medium and $6 large.
To celebrate the day, choose from any of our movies, including new films opening this weekend like Golda, The Owners, Love Life, Bella! This Woman’s Place is in the House, Mutt, or King Coal. Or catch a newly restored modern classic like Oldboy. Haven’t yet seen box office phenomena Barbie or Oppenheimer? Now you can see them as they were meant to be seen, on a big screen, and for cheap!
For more details, visit NationalCinemaDay.org. Join friends, families, and communities of moviegoers at a Laemmle theater near you.
A longtime passion project for star and Academy Award-winning Actress Juliette Binoche, the new film Between Two Worlds is adapted from Florence Aubenas’s bestselling nonfiction work Le Quai de Ouistreham (The Night Cleaner), and marks Emmanuel Carrère’s return to directing for the first time since The Moustache in 2008. Carrère has achieved world renown and acclaim as an author and has been described by Karl Ove Knausgaard as “the most exciting living writer.”
Binoche plays famed author Marianne Winckler as she goes undercover to investigate the exploitation of the working class in Northern France. She eventually lands a job as a cleaner on the cross-channel ferry and develops close connections with the other cleaning women, many of whom have extremely limited resources and income opportunities. As she learns more about the plight of these workers, Marianne struggles with her deception of them and tries to rationalize that it’s for the greater good.
Between Two Worlds had its world premiere as part of the Director’s Fortnight section at the Cannes Film Festival and earned Binoche César and Lumière Best Actress nominations and newcomer Hélène Lambert a Most Promising Actress Lumière nomination. We open the film August 11 at the Royal and and August 18 at the Town Center.
Stay tuned to our socials for a chance to win a limited edition Binoche mini-poster, seen here:
Binoche was interviewed about the film:
Q: When did you first read Florence Aubenas’s “The Night Cleaner?”
A: Probably in 2010 when it was published. It was Cédric Kahn who recommended that I read it, with the idea of making it into a film. I was obviously enthusiastic. But shortly thereafter, Cédric told me to forget about it. Florence Aubenas did not want to give up the adaptation rights, which she confirmed to me when I asked her directly. For her, it was a thing of the past, and she didn’t want to revisit it in a movie.
I’m quite stubborn when a project is close to my heart. So I asked Florence again, and she told me that the only way she would accept was on the condition that Emmanuel Carrère write the screenplay. But Emmanuel was not available at the time; he was working on his novel, “The Kingdom.” To sweeten the deal, I suggested that Emmanuel not only write the adaptation but direct the film. After several dinners with Emmanuel and Florence, she finally agreed. I met a producer who, by chance, was also working on an adaptation of “The Night Cleaner.” The project was starting to take shape but I didn’t want just to act in the film, I wanted to produce it, which for various reasons was refused to me. I experienced this rejection as unfair and humiliating. That being said, since the central theme of Between Two Worlds is the humiliation of women, in the end, it served me well.
Q: When your name is Juliette Binoche, a well-known and recognized actress, how do you get women who are non-professional actresses (and who play their own role as housekeepers) to accept you?
A: My father was dying. I arrived on the set broken and exhausted, which meant that immediately, I was in physical and mental tune with what I had to experience in the film. And the women who played alongside me in the film sensed it right away. I’ve always wanted to play a housekeeper, and basically step into a different universe. When my Polish grandmother came to France during World War II, she had to do odd jobs, like house cleaning, in order to survive. When my mother was a student, she also did some housekeeping jobs. And I too, as a student, did various odd jobs. So in a way, it’s been part of my family history for a long time and it’s still part of me – it’s all about being resourceful and getting by.
Q: Did you do specific research on these women who slave away on ferries?
A: When preparing to shoot Leos Carax’s The Lovers on the Bridge, I spent some time incognito on the street and at the night shelter in Nanterre, which welcomed homeless people in distress. At the end of one of those nights, I returned by bus to Paris with a gentleman of Indian origin who had no idea I was an actress on a scouting mission. He took out a 500-franc note from his pocket and said to me, “If you want, we can spend it together.“ I was extremely touched, but that did not challenge my desire and my right to play the part of a girl who lives on the streets.
The same goes for my role in Between Two Worlds. There is no guilt to be had; the goal here is to understand the life of these quasi-domestic slaves and, if possible, to change the awareness of their miserable living conditions. It’s exactly what happened with Florence’s book, which luckily was a great success, and which I think… I hope… has changed the condition of housekeepers. And made the invisible visible.
Q: Did you read the book again before filming?
A: Yes, of course, but above all the screenplay by Emmanuel Carrère and Hélène Devynck, which is a variation of the book, rather than a literal adaptation. The script stood by itself, like a new fruit grown on the tree that Florence had planted, with its stone, its flesh, its skin… While the film owes everything to the book, it has also grafted its own uniqueness to it.
Q: Most of the other parts in the film are not played by professional actresses but by women reenacting their daily lives…
A: I spent a lot of time talking with these women. Especially with Hélène Lambert, who undoubtedly had the most uncertain temperament in the group. She was building a very strong wall around herself, before deciding if she was going to like playing this role (which was not really a role) and especially, before deciding if she was going to accept me. It took the necessary time, and then suddenly, between two takes, she opened up, telling me about her life as a single mother raising three young children, her various hardships, her walks of several kilometers in the early morning to reach her work place, her family relations…Before taking on the part, my role was to talk to these women, reassure them and convince them that they were quite capable of taking on the happy responsibility of showing the hidden world of their professions, a bit like teaching someone to dance. They are all fantastic: Hélène Lambert, Léa Carne, Emily Madeleine, Evelyne Porée, etc.
Q: What did you learn from them?
A: I was there for them, and they were there for me. I know what work is like, but I hadn’t imagined what it feels like to work and earn so little –virtually nothing– with your hands in shit, literally. Same for the kilometers to cover each morning at dawn, or late in the evening, when most people are in the comfort of their homes. Above all, these women taught me that even in the depths of misery, there is a need for friendship, for fooling around, and having fun. We laughed a lot together.
Q: In this film that revolves around women, there are a few men, including a very endearing character, who is quite flirtatious…
A: It’s Didier Pupin, and he plays this role with great warmth. At the time, he worked at Saint-Maclou [a chain of French stores specializing in floors, walls and windows.] He explained to me how to install carpet! There are also the two Black workers, who are beautiful, and not just physically. On the ferry, or during the break, they just gave in to the joy of living, of laughing and sometimes singing, despite everything.
Q: Between Two Worlds is also a story of betrayal and lies… [WARNING: SPOILER AHEAD]
A: This is a fundamental aspect of the film. My character, Marianne, is no longer a journalist, as in Florence Aubenas’s book, but a well-known writer who decides to experience misery in her little corner and tries to remain unnoticed. Obviously, there’s something in her that reminds us of a spy, or rather, a detective, but in the specific way an actress researches a character so that she can reach that crucial moment when feelings come true.
Marianne is in the middle of the others, she’s with them, with sincerity, but she’s also at a distance, since she takes notes in a notebook and transcribes them at night on her laptop. Where is the boundary between truth and lies? How far are we allowed to lie for the truth to be captured? During the scene where Christèle unmasks Marianne, how do you capture this mixture of stupefaction and disappointment?
Q: Whether or not they’ve read Florence Aubenas’s book, some audience members may be disappointed in the film – you know how it goes: “that’s not how I imagined it…”
A: It’s bound to happen, and they are free to think that way, but it would be good if those who are disappointed reflected on the nature of their disappointment. One of the film’s strengths is precisely that it’s not what people might expect it to be: a precise visual representation of the book, word for word. The film doesn’t petrify the universe of the book; quite the opposite: it extends it and takes it in new directions. I’m really happy and proud that I contributed to this amplification.
Interview conducted by Gérard Lefort
Seeing a movie from your sofa is convenient and pleasant but watching the same film in public takes it from passive consumption to active experience. Funny, frightening, sexy, exciting, awesome movies are 100 times funnier, scarier, sexier and more exciting when seen in public. Being in a theater with strangers allow a frisson that you just do not get at home. The laughter that Barbie elicits and the awe, fear and terror that Oppenheimer elicits make this perfectly clear.
The New York Times just posted a terrific piece about this that articulates this beautifully. It’s by the writer Mark Jacobson.
“For a moment, at least, the Barbenheimer phenomenon brought back the sensation of the movie theater as a semi-sacred public place, a space where we congregate to have an experience, made all the more transcendent by having it together.”
Here’s how it starts:
“It seemed like a miracle. The Cobble Hill Cinemas, a neighborhood joint that opened in the 1920s as the Lido and that served for decades as a venue for B-movie action films, was packed on what would ordinarily be a dead Monday night — and without a single La-Z-Boy recliner, goat cheese pizza or other modern enticement in sight. I was there with 200 or so other patrons, a gloriously mixed crowd, to see Oppenheimer, one-half of the Barbenheimer cultural moment. When the bomb finally went off in the New Mexico desert — this fulcrumatic moment in our species’ history — it was beheld simultaneously, an exhilarating common experience, which is exactly what the movie house is supposed to deliver. In the end, it didn’t matter if you liked the picture or not. What mattered is that we’d seen it together.
“After a few years in which the pandemic and streaming platforms combined to break Americans of their movie theatergoing habits, we’d surged back joyfully, triumphantly, to theaters, producing the fourth biggest domestic weekend of all time. For a moment, it was possible to forget the grim realities that still linger for the cinema business, circling like vultures. The actors’ and writers’ unions (I am a member of the latter) are still on strike with no end in sight. With far fewer products in the pipeline, there won’t be many Barbenheimer-shaped rabbits to pull out of the hat anytime soon. AMC is in trouble. So is Regal, which narrowly avoided having to close its theater in Union Square. On the day before the blockbuster weekend, the Regal UA in Staten Island, one of the last remaining theaters in that borough, closed its doors for good. The 2016 demise of the Ziegfeld means that the largest single-screen theater in Manhattan is now the relatively diminutive 571-seat Paris — which tellingly was saved by and is run by Netflix.
“In the time of streaming and 146-inch TV screens, the simple act of going out to the movies feels contrarian, even subversive. It also feels endangered. That’s grim news, because the beauty of going to the movies was never just about the films on the screens; it was about the way we all gathered to watch them.”
Click here to read the full piece.
A beautiful, allegorical gaze at changing rural China, Return to Dust follows a couple overcoming the challenges of their arranged marriage and the disdain of their families to survive, come together and make a home for themselves. We open the film Friday, July 28 at the Royal.
The writer-director Ruijun Li (River Road, Walking Past the Future) released the following statement upon the release of his film: “It is said that film is the art of time. In this sense, a movie director’s work is essentially the same to that of farmers. In movie making, we are constantly faced with issues dealing with time and life. Farmers trust land and time with their crops and livelihood, so shall we trust land and time with our movies. The words on paper, like seeds growing into harvest, are transformed by camera shots into what we remembered in our distant memories.”
“It’s a gorgeous, quietly affecting film that finds an unassuming beauty in this simple life in rural China, but which doesn’t shy away from the extreme hardships faced by the very poorest.” ~ Wendy Ide, Guardian
“A thought-provoking [film] with beautifully-judged performances that radiate warmth and encourage empathy. It marks Li Ruijun as a significant cinematic talent.” ~ Anna Smith, Deadline Hollywood Daily
“It’s a film which is making the right people angry.” ~ David Jenkins, Little White Lies
“Return to Dust is many things — a vivid portrait of China’s hardscrabble rural north-west, an unexpected victim of state censorship — but it is first and last a love story.” ~ Danny Leigh, Financial Times
Coinciding with the liberation of the term “Taco Tuesdays” from the clutches of Big Taco, Laemmle Theatres is pleased to bring back our weekly discount program New Deal Tuesdays. We first introduced it during the Great Recession of 2007-2009 and although economists are now saying we will probably avoid another economic downturn any time soon, it is always a good time to encourage people to see movies as they were meant to be seen, where they are scientifically proven (research pending) to be 1000% better: in theaters.
For a limited time, we will sell all tickets for all Tuesday afternoon and evening screenings for only seven dollars. (Fine print: the discount only applies to movies we’re screening as part of regular engagements, so that excludes operas and film festivals. But those represent a fraction of the films we show.) This means that if one were to bring six friends or family members to a Laemmle movie on any given Tuesday, said person and their party could all enjoy the flick for only [7 x 7, checks calculator] $49!
Laemmle Theatres and the Anniversary Classics Series present a 30th anniversary screening of director Joe Dante’s cinematic love letter to the movies and movie makers, ‘Matinee‘ (1993). The period comedy, set in that milestone movie year 1962, is a delightful homage to not only the movies, but also to the moviegoing experience and growing up in that era.
John Goodman stars as an independent filmmaker, Lawrence Woolsey, specializing in low-budget science fiction and horror movies who comes to Key West, Florida with his actress girlfriend (Cathy Moriarty) for a special premiere of his latest exploitation quickie, ‘Mant!’ Woolsey, who is also a huckster showman, brings his newest gimmick, “Rumble-Rama,” to the Saturday afternoon opening. The premiere coincides with the real-life fears of nuclear annihilation generated by the Cuban Missile Crisis unfolding as a backdrop. The movie within a movie, ‘Mant!’, is a clever parody morphing of the sci-fi horror cheapies of the 50s and early 60s, melding radioactivity paranoia with mad scientists and mutations. With a knowing screenplay by Charles S. Haas, including a subplot involving a budding teenage romance when a local teen (Simon Fenton), whose U.S. Navy father is called to duty during the Cuban crisis, falls for a high school classmate (Kellie Martin) with a very jealous boyfriend. The film climaxes at the vintage local movie theater in a mash-up of mayhem and affectionate moviegoing memories.
Dante cast a number of veteran actors, some of whom actually played in the movies he was sending up, including William Schallert, Dick Miller, Kevin McCarthy, and Jesse White as the theater owner, with Robert Picardo as the anxious theater manager who has a bomb shelter in the basement. Featuring writer–director John Sayles in a cameo, and one of the earliest screen appearances for future Oscar-nominated actress Naomi Watts.
Critics of the day fully embraced the film, with Roger Ebert calling it “a delightful comedy and one of the most charming movies in a long time.” Rita Kempley of the Washington Post cited it as “a funny, philosophical salute to B-movies and the B-movie moguls who made them. Dante looks back fondly on growing up with the apocalypse always on your mind and atomic mutants lurking under your bed.” In USA Today, Mike Clark was equally enthusiastic, writing, “Part spoof, part nostalgia trip and part primer in exploitation-pic ballyhoo, ‘Matinee‘ is a sweetly resonant little movie-lovers’ movie.”
Our special guest Joe Dante started his career in the late 70s, directing and sometimes writing and editing the kind of low budget genre films (‘Hollywood Boulevard,’ ‘Piranha’) that he enjoyed in his formative moviegoing years, before making a major critical and commercial breakthrough with 1981’s ‘The Howling.’ He followed that success with the classic horror comedy ‘Gremlins,’ with ‘Explorers,’ ‘Innerspace,’ ‘The ‘Burbs,’ ‘Gremlins 2,’ ‘Small Soldiers,’ and ‘Looney Toons: Back in Action’ among his subsequent credits.
Join us at 7 pm on Thursday, July 27 at the Royal in West Los Angeles for a special evening with Joe Dante and a screening of ‘Matinee.’ For added fun enjoy a trivia contest with prizes about the landmark movie year of 1962, which is arguably “the greatest year at the movies.”